Test sc1.2.5_l3_001: Sign language for multimedia: video contains no sign language interpretation [unconfirmed]

Metadata

Formal Metadata
Title Sign language for multimedia: video contains no sign language interpretation
Applies To WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion 1.2.5 (Level 3)
Status unconfirmed (test sample received and under review for completeness) (Review Process)
Review History Test Samples Satus List
Creator Developed by W3C / WAI 's Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG). We invite comments and discussion. Please address your feedback to public-wai-ert-tests@w3.org, a mailing list with a public archive.
Rights Copyright © 1994-2006 W3C ® ( MIT , ERCIM , Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply. Your interactions with this site are in accordance with our public and Member privacy statements.
Language en
Last Updated 2007/09/25 13:59:24(@@=last change of metadata file)

Test Case

Description

Document containing a link to a video file without sign language interpretation.

Purpose

The document is intended to fail because no sign language interpretation is provided in the multimedia file. Only existence of sign language interpretation is tested.

Test Files

Metadata file (XML).

Sample file.

Expected Results

The test case needs review before it can be established if it passes or fails success criterion 1.2.5 (Level 3). The code that causes doubt can be found at line 9, column 18.

Missing references to techniques/failures!

Technologies and Features

Technologies are markup languages or data formats. If the technology is a markup language, “features” refers to elements and attributes.

The presentation of this information needs more work; will be done later.

XHTML™ 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition)

XHTML™ 1.0 The Extensible HyperText Markup Language (Second Edition) .

Windows Media Video

Windows Media Video.